<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Okay, the web IS a revolution.  But its STILL really dumb&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.niall-larkin.com/blog/2007/05/21/okay-the-web-is-a-revolution-but-its-still-really-dumb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.niall-larkin.com/blog/2007/05/21/okay-the-web-is-a-revolution-but-its-still-really-dumb/</link>
	<description>...even a dice can roll</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Lally</title>
		<link>http://www.niall-larkin.com/blog/2007/05/21/okay-the-web-is-a-revolution-but-its-still-really-dumb/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Lally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.niall-larkin.com/blog/?p=59#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>Niall,

99% of the "stuff' thats on the internet is DUMB.
Trying 2 make sense of it and 'infer' some knowledge or relationships is HARD.

Google does an OK job at it as a search engine but its limited to its 'search' context and the way its algorithm works (ranking etc.)
There are other search engines out there which do a better job but then they are focused by context (music, events etc..)
Ditto for all the many internet websites that try and fill a particular niche (e.g. TechCrunch with startup tech news etc..)

The Semantic web is supposed 2 help us solve all this but how long do u think b4 the 'web' is semantic-meta-augmented so our new semantic aware browsers can (within context) find the answer 2 your 'How many Web 2.0 companies in the Valley' ???

Methinks it will be a while. hopefully the work DERI (and others are doing) will add some real value to the existing web (as opposed 2 only working for 'new' sites where the owners fill in that semantic meta data).

Lal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niall,</p>
<p>99% of the &#8220;stuff&#8217; thats on the internet is DUMB.<br />
Trying 2 make sense of it and &#8216;infer&#8217; some knowledge or relationships is HARD.</p>
<p>Google does an OK job at it as a search engine but its limited to its &#8217;search&#8217; context and the way its algorithm works (ranking etc.)<br />
There are other search engines out there which do a better job but then they are focused by context (music, events etc..)<br />
Ditto for all the many internet websites that try and fill a particular niche (e.g. TechCrunch with startup tech news etc..)</p>
<p>The Semantic web is supposed 2 help us solve all this but how long do u think b4 the &#8216;web&#8217; is semantic-meta-augmented so our new semantic aware browsers can (within context) find the answer 2 your &#8216;How many Web 2.0 companies in the Valley&#8217; ???</p>
<p>Methinks it will be a while. hopefully the work DERI (and others are doing) will add some real value to the existing web (as opposed 2 only working for &#8216;new&#8217; sites where the owners fill in that semantic meta data).</p>
<p>Lal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
