Posts Feed
Comments Feed

Archive for July, 2007

A beautiful time to be a Paddy on his way to the Valley

Conditions couldn’t be better for new small companies with big ideas going to the valley.

See full size image

(Also see James Corbett’s more up-to-date view of SV here and all the important hotspots for Paddy’s Valley. Note: how close our hotel is to the new HQ of Facebook.)

Why?
An acceleration in online innovation and a recognition that early leaders like ebay, Google and Yahoo’s are posting dissapointing results and losing business to startups means that VCs are putting their money into Web2.0 startups like never before.

Web2.0 has become a well worn phrase over the past couple of years but this last quarter the money is following the rhetoric in earnest. Continue Reading »

3 Comments »

The joy of running with the herd

A herd of Wildebeest

Damien Mulley recounts a real life and personal example of sales by herd instinct that I was also involved in. 

Via Walter Higgin’s Twitter is the story of how Gordon Murray from eWrite brought along his Nokia 770 Internet Tablet to Open Coffee Cork. A quick showing around and with a pricetag of €100 ex VAT and Walter decided to buy two, Rory bought one and Diarmuid bought four apparently. Walter’s Twitter evangelising of it then got Conor, myself, Niall and Elly to buy one. So 24 hours later and 11 have been purchased, all as a result of one person at an event yesterday.

Damien’s comments on this social phenomenon are well worth catching here ”if a company can figure out how to make your friend a salesperson then their sales rates would go through the roof.”

Continue Reading »

7 Comments »

Google: Dont’ be Evil? Don’t be dismissive. Don’t be pompous. Don’t be disdainful…

gapingvoid.com - Hugh MacLeod search cartoon

 

Much as I love this cartoon, I think it distracts from the more interesting (and ultimately) more important story arc that applies to Google: Are we disdainful yet?

Right now. The answer would seem to be yes. 

Eric Schmidt recently

  • dismissed the refusal of social networks such as Facebook to let Google scan their content as a “transient” phase.

This remarks demonstrate

  • a peculiar disdain for peoples’ natural desire to maintain some privacy with respect to their social interaction
  • an apparent blind spot to the fact that a natural desire for privacy means that monetizing personal interaction is a fundamentally different business to monetizing search

and

  • suggests that Google maintains a curious belief that it will soon be able to publish all the data it wants over and above what the producers of that content want. And be justified in doing so.

To put these remarks in context, we have to remember that Google is a company who’s business relies on internet search. Internet search has been the killer app. of the web and Google have been the most successful company at delivering and monetizing that service. However, search has recently been superceded by social interaction as the new killer app. of the web.  Internet users now spend much more time and energy engaged in social interactions mediated across the web than they do in searching for content.  And this social interaction is occuring within walled gardens that exclude Google from accessing its contents in order to protect the privacy of it’s attendees.  

Given the context, it would seem that Google

  • is getting tetchy at being excluded from a party it considers itself ’entitled’ to attend.

Continue Reading »

6 Comments »

Have we lost the basic element of humanity…trust.

Asks this disillusioned blogger plaintively commenting on the ins and outs of the FB/ConnectU legal wrangle as it comes to a head.

No Comments »

Another “Brain Quirk” that the entrepreneur needs appreciate…

Earlier today I read and sent a link to this lifehack article into twitter-land.

Since that I’ve been reading about Charles Kettering, a fascinating man who invented the automatic ignition for cars, the spark plug, and the electric cash register among other things and whose name was taken by Kettering University.

Charles Kettering, on a Time cover, 1933

He believed that the natural suspicion we all feel toward new things to be a basic quirk of the human brain.

Human beings are so constituted as to see what is wrong with a new thing, not what is right. To verify this you only have to submit a new idea to a committee.  They will obliterate 90% of rightness for 10% of wrongness.

Obviously, given Kettering’s ability to translate inventions into innovations (ie ideas into products that the market embraced) he had the knack not only for solving technical problems but also for recognising and working around the problems/reality of human nature. 

 

No Comments »

Thoughts on what makes a gift, a gift?

I’ve done a lot of thinking and reading on the subject of gifts, gifting and gift economies this past 12 months.  There is a huge amount of acadmic work published on the subject.  Its one of those subjects that we all understand inherently but also find so fuzzy as to defy definition on closer examination. Lucy Kellaway in todays FT writes:

 

 

There are two tests to mark out the generous gift.  The first, it must hurt a bit.  Second, you musn’t shout about it.

Lucy is always worth reading. She has a knack for distilling down complex sociological concepts that otherwise fill entire shelves of dusty academic libraries into no nonsense tasty little bit-sized portions. Sample more from Lucy here:

4 Comments »

Anyone for a Dublin Code Jam?

Last Tuesday, Paul Campbell gave RubyIreland’s first “lightning talk” (on RIO btw). The lightning talk is an idea he picked up from his recent visit to the superhappydevhouse in California. Naturally it wasn’t long till talk turned to having a shdv-like codejam in Dublin as first proposed by Colm McHugh. Discussion rolled over into Wednesday, Thursday and Friday and with increasing momentum built on Twitter, Facebook and good old-fashioned email, Olivier wondered it the time was ripe to set up a wiki and John Ward stepped up and confronted the scary blank space and suggested an excellent project to get the ball rolling. I put out a tentative call for project ideas to the Social Entrepreneurs Ireland network on Wednesday night and had over 20 proposals in my inbox the next morning. The exciting thing is that there seems to be a latent hunger for this sort of event at grassroots level. And speaking of hunger there’s some significant early momentum towards cross-pollinating the event with a cook-off to feed the troops coming from Qamir (seen here pitching at Curry 2.0 in Jaipur in the Punjabi language and who has cooked for over 100 people in the past). It also turns out that the Java User’s Group were thinking similar thoughts as seen here on Paul Browne’s blog slanted towards a kindof face-off between java, php, ruby and python crowds. Which reminds me. Maybe its time to start a list of on the wiki of groups ad hoc or formal that might be interested? http://dublincodejam.pbwiki.com/

3 Comments »

The big boys are starting to see the light!

Digital Business: Redux of a special report with the FT. 

I enjoyed this supplement from the FT because it is peppered with expert recognition that technology needs to be aligned with our hard-wired social processes if we are to leverage it to social ends.  My sctick is that social software sucks as it exists today.  There are fundamental hard problems of identity, reputation and trust engrained into the social software we use.  We need a new approach. And to give a rough approximation of a quote attributed to Einstein “We cannot hope to solve the problems we are confronted with today by using the same thinking that created these problems in the first place”

  • Crispin O’Brien of KPMG “The more you can network people in an informal way, the more value a company can create.”He also argues that computers have to behave more like humans and that the next phase of workplace IT could be as influenced by social anthropology as by writers of computer code.
  • John Gage, chief researcher for Sun Microsystems points out that, in his view, the big issue is the conjunction of the identity of people, objects, programs and data with location.
  • It is official: we cannot cope with information overload – apparently, we are not designed to analyse large amounts of data and draw irrefutable conclusions.

Continue Reading »

No Comments »

Facebook just got even cooler. It makes barely any money.

Anyway, what’s so cool about not making money?  Well, it was a couple of years after Google won our hearts and mindshare with clean design and being good at their core proposition before they discovered how to make money without making us uncomfortable.

Facebook has been true to similar principles for the past couple of years.  The big question: Will the big-guy-karma-king provide for FB who have stepped forward into the unknown in faith and hope. I don’t know. But it makes compelling viewing.

That’s the end of this post really.  Unless you are a nerd. That is as opposed to a geek.  Y’know geeks being kinda cool, nice guys/gals who find themselves cringing at the kind of stuff that excites us nerds. You have been warned.

I find its always makes an interesting study in comparison of style when Mashable and Valleywag report simulataneously on the same story.  Nerd squared. That’s me.  As opposed to Geek squared.  What can I say. So for your delectation and without further commentary. I present the following posts from Valleywag and Mashable in the raw.

Valleywag:

Randi Jayne gets the rag from ValleywagToday, I don’t think Randi Jayne, director of market development at Facebook and sister of CEO Mark Zuckerberg, would sing quite so gleefully about “startups [that] get the rag … from Valleywag.” Because now comes her employer’s turn. The Reach Students blog notes that a campaign on Facebook drew a 0.04% click-through rate — a dismal response that’s far from uncommon in advertisers’ experiences. No wonder the site is scraping the bottom of the barrel to find advertisers. If Zuckerberg is to maintain his site’s precious independence, he will have to figure out better ways for his company — and its advertisers — to profit from its rapidly swelling user base. Should he consider placing ads on his sister’s show tunes instead? They’d get better click-throughs.

Mashable:

Facebook is known for its minimalist design, and any ads within the site are largely unobtrusive. There are ads on Facebook, though, in the form of banners and flyers. One company, Reach Students, has found that the clickthrough rate for flyer ads is less than desirable.

After toying around with its ads, Reach Students found that the clickthrough rate was only about 0.04%, with 1.4 million page impressions. Turns out, this low clickthrough rate has been the case for nearly every company that advertises on Facebook with both banners and flyers. A precise reason for the low clickthrough rate has yet to be determined, though some say its the ‘messaging’ nature of Facebook, drawing users in for a reason other than the site’s content, but this point is very arguable. It’s also important to note that much of the data on Facebook ads and their resulting clickthrough rate is anecdotal, though some studies have been done.

With the release of one ad network for Facebook apps and another one soon to be launched, perhaps we’ll see some culmination of ads within a certain level of Facebook communication. Or we’ll see the same reaction from users towards a Facebook apps advertising network, leaving much to be desired.

 

 

No Comments »

Tailgate: Now why didn’t I think of that…

Beautiful simple effective proposition. 

Tailgates technology delivers ecommerce transactions from the banner itself. Essentially users can purchase items by interacting with the banner as opposed to having to click through to another page. The benefits from web sites owners are immediately obvious: using Tailgate, advertisements will no longer take users from their sites. For advertisers, capturing impulse buyers just became that much more easy. More on techcrunch

Looking forward to seeing it everywhere.

No Comments »

Next »